![]() ![]() Third, it tests proposals for ‘saving’ human rights from its colonial-hegemonic past-by repoliticizing it-against writing on settler decolonization, to ask about the role of human rights in/as decolonial politics. Second, it presents a critical history of the normative evolution of the right to self-determination in both law and discourse as these relate to Indigenous peoples, showing how the norm is constructed both to make illegible other forms of Indigenous political life and to reify anthropological tropes about Indigenous culture. ![]() ![]() First, the thesis reads critiques of human rights against emerging literature in settler colonial studies, showing how the irreducible element of an eliminatory drive for land, which characterizes settler colonialism, is not accounted for in the existing critical literature on human rights. By situating these interactions between human rights and Indigenous political life in the context of settler colonialism, it aims to bring out the complexity of a politics of (ref)usal that permeates this relationship, in this context. ![]() This thesis is a critical history of ideas-or a history of repressed and repressive ideas (and histories)-that analyses how liberal internationalism, in the form of human rights, presses upon, covers over, brushes against, interacts with, or is used instrumentally by Indigenous activism and political life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |